Proposed Ordinance Could Kill Chicago Comedy Scene - Protest Now
A proposed ordinance, for which there has been almost no public discourse, is going to vote on Wednesday, and could cripple Chicago's nightlife, including the comedy and music scenes.
Chapter 4-157 of Title IV of the Municipal Code of the City of Chicago (posted here in its entirety) would levy huge licensing fees on all promoters of live events, including small comedy shows like those at the Playground Theater, the Hideout, the Beat Kitchen, Schubas, the Lincoln Lodge, the Cornservatory, and pretty much everywhere else you go to see comedy throughout the city.
According to the ordinance, any event promoter would need a license from the city of Chicago (ranging in price from $500 to $2,000) and liability insurance of $300,000.
Time Out Chicago is hosting some videos from promoters explaining how this ordinance would "put them out of business."
Go here to sign the online petition, which will "be presented to the City Council and to all Chicago Aldermen prior to Wednesday’s vote."
No kidding, folks, go now and sign the online petition, or music and comedy in Chicago will no longer exist in their current form.
Edited to add: it wouldn't hurt to send an email to your alderman either, as did Chicago Underground Comedy producer Dan Telfer. Dan allowed us to reprint this letter he sent to his alderman:
Dear Mr. Tunney,
My name is Dan Telfer. I have been performing in various theater and comedy companies in Chicago for 12 years. During much of that time I have produced my own plays, sketch revues, and stand-up showcases. I have lived here my entire life.
The promoter's ordinance on the table would completely destroy 90% of the live performance in this city. It is easy for those outside our community to believe that the bigger the audience, the more important the work. However, almost all of the music and performance here is done without any sort of insurance on the producer's part, usually because the venue has their own insurance. We rely on venues to allow us rentals based on appreciation for what we do.
More importantly, there is no budget in any promoter's spreadsheet for this. It's not just that we have never had to shell out money to the city for this sort of thing, it's that there simply isn't revenue to balance it out. Many shows make just enough to pay rent, and the performers work for free. And again, I cannot possibly state this enough, when I say many I mean MANY shows. I mean that I have actively been involved in the community for a long time, and I know being incorporated or a non-profit allows for sponsors and grants. Those production companies are already asked by their renters to get insurance if they hope to perform in a space long-term. But the fight for those grants and sponsors, particularly in this desperate economy, is more work than any start-up company (comprised of a handful of people with full-time day jobs that barely pay their residential rent) can bear. This ordinance would destroy the gap between an up and coming young group of performers and a professional one with years of experience and money to spend.
We must not only stop this from being passed, we must never allow one like it again. For every $500 - $2000 bill the city earns from this, dozens of people will leave the city in frustration because their artistic outlet is banished. To do this to venues only under 500 in capacity is even more insulting. It's the sort of looking-out-for-the-rich logic that makes me fear the direction this country is going.
Please join the rest of your community on this,
Dan Telfer
Producer and Performer of Blewt Productions (blewt.com)
Company Member of Theater Oobleck (theateroobleck.com)
Producer and Performer of Chicago Underground Comedy (chicagoundergroundcomedy.com)
dantelfer@gmail.com
dan@blewt.com
dan@chicagoundergroundcomedy.com












Comments
Well, the first time someone gets fined for breaking the code we'll just hold a benefit show for . . . oh fuck, nevermind.
Posted by: Fritz | May 12, 2008 4:05 PM
It's about time! Too many bad shows in Chicago anyway.
Posted by: George Wahwah | May 12, 2008 4:11 PM
Nicely done, Dan. Much more eloquent than my own letter to Alderman Schulter. Let's hope they do the trick.
Posted by: Christopher | May 13, 2008 12:13 AM
I recommend that, should you contact someone, you make it Alderman Eugene Schulter. He is the one who is spearheading the ordinance.
His webpage is here:
http://www.ward47.com/site/epage/25124_160.htm
If he is flooded with emails, he at the least won't be able to say "Hey, nobody told me it was a bad idea".
I have resent him the above letter to Alderman Tunney.
Posted by: Dan Telfer | May 13, 2008 9:50 AM
Don't these lines keep performers exempt?
Who is not required to obtain a Promoters License?
-Performers or agents of performers at an event.
-PPA licensees and employees promoting their own event.
That means if Telfer wants to promote ChUC as a performer, and it's at the (assumedly) PPA sanctioned Beat Kitchen, then he's fine.
Posted by: Steve Heisler | May 13, 2008 10:37 AM
I take "Performer" to mean "Performer, not Producer".
I don't know, the city has little empathy for loopholes. I'm not saying there are any plans to stop ChUC, but that seems ripe for fining.
Posted by: Dan Telfer | May 13, 2008 11:41 AM
This guy is an idiot! Listen to this interview on CPR
http://wbez.org/Content.aspx?audioID=22731
Posted by: OPRJ | May 13, 2008 1:22 PM
Ordinance tabl'd!
http://blogs.suntimes.com/derogatis/2008/05/update_promoters_ordinance_tab.html#more
WOO.
Posted by: Dan Telfer | May 13, 2008 1:37 PM